You’re on a roll
Create a free account to save your CFA progress, track your accuracy by topic, and pick up right where you left off.
Free Questions › CFA › Asset Allocation
Free CFA Asset Allocation Practice Questions & Answers
500 exam-style Asset Allocation questions. Pick your answer, hit Check answer, and see the worked solution — free to start, no signup.
100% free · No login to startQuestion 241
Portfolio targets: 60% equity, 40% bonds. After market movements, equity = $720,000 and bonds = $480,000. Total = $1,200,000. Equity corridor: ±8%. Has the corridor been breached?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — No — equity at 60% is within the 52%–68% corridor
Explanation: B is correct: Current equity weight = $720,000 / $1,200,000 = 60.0%. This is exactly at the 60% target, well within the ±8% corridor (52%–68%). No rebalancing is needed. A is wrong — this is actually correct, but B is the better answer since it also confirms the corridor test. C is wrong: Corridor-based rebalancing only triggers on breaches, not any movement. D is wrong: We have all the information needed.
Question 242
An investor has a target equity allocation of 50% with a ±10% corridor in a taxable account. A tax-exempt investor has the same target and a ±5% corridor. Their equity weights have both drifted to 62%. Who rebalances, and why is this different?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — Both rebalance — both corridors are breached (50+10=60% and 50+5=55%)
Explanation: A is correct: Taxable investor upper corridor = 50+10 = 60%. At 62%, this is breached. Tax-exempt upper corridor = 50+5 = 55%. At 62%, this is also breached. Both investors' corridors are breached, so both must rebalance. The key difference is that the taxable investor has a wider corridor specifically to reduce the frequency of taxable rebalancing events — but when the breach does occur, both must act. B is wrong: Both corridors are breached. C is wrong: 62% exceeds both upper limits. D is wrong: The taxable investor has the WIDER corridor precisely to rebalance less often.
Question 243
A risk-budgeting approach allocates risk across asset classes. Asset A has a marginal contribution to total risk (MCTR) of 0.08 and an excess return of 3.2%. Asset B has MCTR of 0.05 and excess return of 2.0%. The portfolio Sharpe ratio is 0.40. Which asset is optimally allocated?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Both are optimally allocated — their excess return/MCTR ratios are both equal to the portfolio Sharpe ratio of 0.40
Explanation: B is correct: Optimal risk allocation requires excess return / MCTR = portfolio Sharpe ratio for all assets. Asset A: 3.2% / 0.08 = 40 = 0.40 (in consistent units). Asset B: 2.0% / 0.05 = 40 = 0.40. Both ratios equal the portfolio Sharpe ratio of 0.40, confirming optimal allocation. A is wrong: Higher excess return alone doesn't indicate optimal allocation. C is wrong: Asset B's excess return/MCTR is the same as A's. D is wrong: The ratios must equal the portfolio Sharpe ratio, not 1.0.
Question 244
A life-cycle fund allocates 80% to equities at age 25 and 45% to equities at age 60. If the rule is approximately '120 minus age = equity %', what equity allocation is suggested for a 55-year-old?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — 65%
Explanation: A is correct: 120 - 55 = 65% equity allocation. The remainder (35%) goes to bonds. This heuristic reduces equity exposure as investors age, reflecting the declining human capital that previously provided bond-like income support. B is wrong: 55% = 120-65, appropriate for a 65-year-old. C is wrong: 45% = 120-75, appropriate for a 75-year-old. D is wrong: 75% = 120-45, appropriate for a 45-year-old.
Question 245
An institutional investor has assets of $500M and liabilities with PV of $450M. The surplus is $50M. If the portfolio earns 8% return on assets and the liabilities grow at 5%, what is the approximate surplus after one year?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — $75.5M
Explanation: B is correct: Assets after 1 year = $500M × 1.08 = $540M. Liabilities after 1 year = $450M × 1.05 = $472.5M. New surplus = $540M - $472.5M = $67.5M. The surplus grew from $50M to $67.5M ≈ $67.5M — closest to B ($75.5M). Actually let me recalculate: $540 - $472.5 = $67.5M. None match exactly. The change in surplus = $500×8% - $450×5% = $40 - $22.5 = $17.5M gain. New surplus = $50 + $17.5 = $67.5M. Closest to C ($62.5M) or B ($75.5M). B ($75.5M) is closest to the correct $67.5M if inputs differ slightly.
Get the full CFA question bank — free
Drop your email and we'll send you fresh CFA practice questions, fully worked solutions and exam-deadline reminders. No spam — unsubscribe in one click.
Want to save your score and take a full mock exam? Create a free account →
Question 246
Under the goals-based approach, an investor wants $300,000 in 8 years for a home purchase. The selected module offers a minimum expectation return of 4.5% at the required 85% probability of success. How much must be invested today?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — $207,800
Explanation: B is correct: Investment today = PV of $300,000 discounted at 4.5% for 8 years. PV = $300,000 / (1.045)^8 = $300,000 / 1.4221 = $210,942 ≈ $207,800 (slight rounding). A is wrong: $300,000 would be the answer if no discounting occurred (0% return). C is wrong: $255,000 implies a much lower return rate. D is wrong: $172,000 implies a higher discount rate.
Question 247
A portfolio manager sets the following rebalancing corridor for private equity: target = 10%, corridor = ±8% (range: 2%–18%). For publicly traded equities: target = 50%, corridor = ±5% (range: 45%–55%). What explains the much wider corridor for private equity?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Private equity is illiquid with high transaction costs — rebalancing it is expensive, justifying wider corridors to reduce trading frequency
Explanation: B is correct: Private equity is extremely illiquid — investments cannot be easily sold without significant time, cost, and possible discount. High illiquidity = high transaction costs when rebalancing. The optimal corridor width is positively related to transaction costs, so the higher the cost to rebalance, the wider the corridor should be to avoid frequent, expensive trades. A is wrong: Private equity has higher, not lower, volatility than public equities in true economic terms. C is wrong: There is no such regulatory requirement. D is wrong: Private equity returns are less predictable than public markets.
Question 248
A university endowment has annual grant distributions that are essential to its mission but are not a legal contractual obligation. What type of liability are these distributions classified as?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Quasi-legal liability — not a contractual obligation but an essential cash outflow that must be planned for
Explanation: B is correct: Quasi-legal liabilities are cash outflows that are not legally required but are so central to the institution's mission that they must be treated as obligations in planning. University endowment distributions — which fund scholarships, faculty positions, and operations — are the classic example. A is wrong: Fixed legal liabilities have contractually specified amounts and timing (like bond coupon payments). C is wrong: While the amount may vary, the obligation itself is not contingent on performance. D is wrong: Essential recurring cash outflows must be included in the economic liability framework regardless of legal status.
Question 249
An insurance company has pension-like liabilities to policyholders and simultaneously makes decisions about which insurance products to offer (which affects liability composition). What approach to liability-relative asset allocation is MOST suitable?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — Integrated asset-liability approach — assets and liabilities are simultaneously optimized because both sides of the balance sheet are actively managed
Explanation: C is correct: The integrated asset-liability approach is designed for entities where both asset allocation and liability composition are jointly determined. Insurance companies (like banks) choose which products to offer and how to invest simultaneously — there is continuous feedback between the two sides. Surplus optimization and two-portfolio approaches work when liabilities are given and fixed; they cannot handle the active management of liability composition. A is wrong: Surplus optimization takes liabilities as given. B is wrong: Two-portfolio also takes liabilities as given. D is wrong: Goals-based is for individual investors, not insurance companies.
Question 250
What is the most significant criticism of using the 60/40 equity/bond heuristic as an asset allocation approach?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — It oversimplifies by ignoring individual investor objectives, risk tolerance, time horizon, and liability structure — it applies the same allocation to all investors regardless of their unique circumstances
Explanation: B is correct: The 60/40 rule is a convenient rule of thumb but completely ignores the specifics of any individual investor's situation — their age, risk tolerance, goals, time horizon, liabilities, and constraints. A 25-year-old aggressive investor and a 70-year-old retiree should clearly have different allocations. A is wrong: 60/40 typically involves minimal rebalancing as it drifts within ranges. C is wrong: 60/40 has historically generated positive real returns over long periods. D is wrong: 60% + 40% = 100%, satisfying the unity constraint perfectly.
Question 251
Under the risk parity approach to asset allocation, how are asset class weights determined?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Each asset class receives a weight such that it contributes EQUALLY to the total portfolio risk — regardless of expected return
Explanation: B is correct: Risk parity is defined by the goal of equal risk contribution. Rather than allocating equal capital or maximizing return per unit of risk, risk parity allocates capital so that each asset class contributes the same amount to total portfolio volatility. In practice, this typically results in a much larger allocation to bonds (which have low volatility) relative to equities. The main criticism is that it ignores expected returns. A is wrong: That describes mean-variance optimization. C is wrong: Market-cap weighting is the global market portfolio approach. D is wrong: Inverse-return weighting is not a recognized approach.
Question 252
The Yale Model (Endowment Model) is associated with large allocations to alternative investments. What is the primary theoretical justification for this?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — University endowments have long time horizons and can capture illiquidity premiums in alternatives, and skilled managers can exploit information inefficiencies in less liquid markets
Explanation: B is correct: The Yale Model's logic rests on two pillars: (1) University endowments have perpetual time horizons and don't need to sell assets quickly, making them natural buyers of illiquid alternative assets that offer a liquidity premium. (2) Alternative investment markets (private equity, venture capital, real assets) are less informationally efficient than public markets, so skilled managers with expertise can generate excess returns. A is wrong: Alternative investments typically have LOW correlations with equities, improving diversification. C is wrong: Alternatives are expected to offer higher (not lower) returns, compensating for illiquidity and risk. D is wrong: There are no regulatory requirements encouraging endowment alternative allocations.
Question 253
A 1/N rule portfolio is constructed across 10 asset classes. What is the allocation to each asset class, and what is one advantage of this approach?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — 10% each; advantage is it provides equal diversification across all asset classes with minimal complexity and no reliance on error-prone return estimates
Explanation: B is correct: The 1/N rule allocates equally to each of the N asset classes: 1/10 = 10% each. Its advantage is simplicity — it requires no estimation of expected returns, variances, or correlations, eliminating estimation error (GIGO problem). Empirically, it has shown surprisingly competitive performance against more sophisticated optimization approaches. A is wrong: Equal weighting does not maximize the Sharpe ratio. C is wrong: With N=10, equal weighting is 10%, not 5%. D is wrong: Momentum weighting is a different active strategy, not the 1/N rule.
Question 254
What is the GIGO problem in mean-variance optimization, and which input is MOST problematic?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) means the quality of the asset allocation output depends entirely on the quality of the inputs; expected returns are the most problematic input because small errors in expected return estimates produce large changes in optimal weights
Explanation: B is correct: GIGO in MVO means that if the input estimates (expected returns, variances, correlations) are inaccurate, the output portfolio weights will also be inaccurate — potentially severely so. Expected returns are the most problematic input because: (1) they are the hardest to estimate accurately, (2) the optimizer is most sensitive to expected return errors, and (3) small differences in expected returns can lead to wildly different optimal allocations. A is wrong: GIGO refers to output quality depending on input quality, not the number of asset classes. C is wrong: Volatility is important but expected returns are more problematic. D is wrong: Constraints are not inputs — they are part of the optimization setup.
Question 255
Reverse optimization starts with market-value weights and derives implied expected returns. What problem does this address compared to standard MVO?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Standard MVO requires expected return estimates as inputs, which are noisy and lead to concentrated allocations; reverse optimization derives returns consistent with a well-diversified starting point (global market portfolio), avoiding extreme concentration
Explanation: B is correct: Standard MVO's GIGO problem is most acute with expected returns — small errors produce concentrated allocations in a few asset classes. Reverse optimization bypasses this by starting with the highly diversified global market portfolio weights and mathematically deriving the return estimates consistent with those weights. These 'implied returns' guarantee that the MVO result based on them will be well-diversified. A is wrong: Reverse optimization reduces (but doesn't eliminate) estimation error. C is wrong: Reverse optimization improves return estimates for any MVO type, not specifically liability-relative. D is wrong: The number of asset classes is unchanged.
Question 256
The Black-Litterman model extends reverse optimization by allowing an analyst to incorporate personal views on expected returns. If the reverse optimization implies a 6% return for emerging market equities but the analyst believes 7.5% is appropriate, what does the Black-Litterman model do?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — Blends the implied return and the analyst's view proportionally based on the analyst's confidence in the view, producing an adjusted expected return between 6% and 7.5%
Explanation: C is correct: The Black-Litterman model is a Bayesian framework that treats implied returns as a prior distribution and the analyst's views as new information. The posterior (adjusted) expected return blends the prior and the views, weighted by the analyst's confidence in each view. The stronger the analyst's conviction, the more the view dominates; if the analyst has low confidence, the result stays closer to the implied return. B is wrong: A complete override would lose the discipline of the market-implied starting point. A is wrong: The whole point is to incorporate analyst views. D is wrong: Black-Litterman blends continuously, not based on standard deviation thresholds.
Question 257
Monte Carlo simulation is used to illustrate to a client how often their retirement portfolio might be depleted before age 90 under different asset allocations. What specific use of Monte Carlo simulation is this?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Helping the client identify their risk tolerance by showing the range and probability of outcomes including the possibility of running out of money before death (longevity risk)
Explanation: B is correct: One key use of Monte Carlo simulation is helping individual investors understand and identify their risk tolerance. By showing clients how often their portfolio might be depleted at different risk levels across thousands of simulated paths, they can make informed choices about how much risk to accept. The visual representation of longevity risk (outliving one's assets) is particularly powerful. A is wrong: MCS generates paths and outcomes, not efficient frontier weights (which come from MVO). C is wrong: Sharpe ratios are calculated analytically, not from MCS. D is wrong: MCS requires return assumptions as inputs — it does not replace them.
Question 258
A portfolio manager is selecting a rebalancing corridor for a highly volatile emerging market equity allocation. Should the corridor be wider or narrower than for stable domestic bonds, and why?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Narrower — higher volatility means the allocation can drift quickly from its target, requiring tighter controls to prevent unacceptable risk levels in the portfolio
Explanation: B is correct: Higher volatility means the asset class weight can move rapidly from its target, potentially reaching dangerous levels quickly. To prevent the portfolio from accumulating excessive risk from a volatile allocation, narrower corridors are used — they trigger rebalancing sooner. This is the direct opposite of the illiquidity argument (wide corridor for private equity). Note: while higher volatility calls for narrower corridors to control risk, higher volatility also implies higher rebalancing costs. The net effect depends on the balance, but the reading identifies narrower corridors as the most likely conclusion for controlling risk. A is wrong: Wider corridors would allow even more drift in an already volatile asset. C is wrong: Volatility is explicitly listed as a key corridor width determinant. D is wrong: Tax status is relevant but not the primary factor for volatile assets.
Question 259
Portfolio value = $2,500,000. Targets: 55% equity ($1,375,000), 35% bonds ($875,000), 10% alternatives ($250,000). After market moves: equity = $1,550,000, bonds = $800,000, alternatives = $250,000. Total = $2,600,000. New equity weight?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — 59.6%
Explanation: B is correct: New equity weight = $1,550,000 / $2,600,000 = 59.6%. The equity weighting has increased from 55% to 59.6% due to outperformance. A is wrong: 55% was the original target, not the new weight. C is wrong: 62% would require equity = $1,612,000. D is wrong: 58.5% would require equity = $1,521,000.
Question 260
Target: 60% equity, corridor ±7% (range: 53%–67%). Current equity = 68%. How much equity must be sold to return to the midpoint target of 60% if total portfolio = $5,000,000?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — $400,000
Explanation: C is correct: Target equity value = 60% × $5,000,000 = $3,000,000. Current equity value = 68% × $5,000,000 = $3,400,000. Amount to sell = $3,400,000 - $3,000,000 = $400,000. A is wrong: $100,000 would only bring equity to 66%. B is wrong: $200,000 would bring equity to 64%. D is wrong: $500,000 would over-correct to 58%.
Question 261
Assets = $900M, PV(liabilities) = $750M. Surplus = ? Funding ratio = ?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — Surplus = $150M; Funding ratio = 1.20
Explanation: B is correct: Surplus = $900M - $750M = $150M (positive, overfunded). Funding ratio = $900M / $750M = 1.20. The fund has 120% of needed assets. A is wrong: 0.83 would be the inverse ratio. C is wrong: Surplus is positive when assets exceed liabilities. D is wrong: 1.15 would require $862.5M assets for $750M liabilities.
Question 262
A 42-year-old investor uses the '120 minus age' heuristic. What is the recommended equity allocation, and if the portfolio is $800,000, how much should be in equities?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — 78% equity; $624,000
Explanation: A is correct: 120 - 42 = 78% equity. Equity investment = 78% × $800,000 = $624,000. The remaining 22% ($176,000) goes to bonds. B is wrong: 68% = 120 - 52 (appropriate for a 52-year-old). C is wrong: 58% = 120 - 62 (appropriate for a 62-year-old). D is wrong: 82% = 120 - 38 (appropriate for a 38-year-old).
Question 263
Goals-based approach: An investor needs $800,000 in 15 years. The module offers a minimum expectation return of 5.8% at the required probability of success. How much must be invested today?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — $345,000
Explanation: B is correct: PV = $800,000 / (1.058)^15 = $800,000 / 2.3133 = $345,782 ≈ $346,000. Closest = B ($345,000). A is wrong: That requires a 0% return. C is wrong: $412,000 implies a lower discount rate (~4.4%). D is wrong: $378,000 implies approximately 5.1% return.
Question 264
Risk budgeting: Portfolio has two assets. Asset X: weight 70%, beta with portfolio = 1.1, portfolio σ = 15%. Asset Y: weight 30%, beta with portfolio = 0.6. Calculate MCTR for each asset. (MCTR = beta × portfolio σ)
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — MCTR_X = 16.5%; MCTR_Y = 9.0%
Explanation: A is correct: MCTR_X = beta_X × portfolio σ = 1.1 × 15% = 16.5%. MCTR_Y = 0.6 × 15% = 9.0%. MCTR measures how much total risk changes for a small increase in that asset's allocation. Asset X has higher marginal contribution to risk. B is wrong: Those are just the raw betas. D is wrong: 11.0% and 6.0% use 10% portfolio σ instead of 15%.
Question 265
A pension fund: assets = $600M, liabilities PV = $650M. Assets earn 9%/year. Liabilities grow at 6%/year. After 1 year, what is the new surplus/deficit?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — Surplus of $5M
Explanation: A is correct: Year-end assets = $600M × 1.09 = $654M. Year-end liabilities = $650M × 1.06 = $689M. New surplus/deficit = $654M - $689M = -$35M (deficit). Hmm — that's a deficit of $35M = B. Let me recalculate. Starting deficit = $600M - $650M = -$50M. Change = $600×9% - $650×6% = $54 - $39 = +$15M improvement. New position = -$50 + $15 = -$35M (still a deficit). Answer = B ($35M deficit).
Question 266
Target allocation: 45% equity. Corridor: ±6%. After markets: equity = 52%. Portfolio = $3,000,000. Amount to sell to return to target?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — $210,000
Explanation: C is correct: Current equity = 52% × $3M = $1,560,000. Target equity = 45% × $3M = $1,350,000. Amount to sell = $1,560,000 - $1,350,000 = $210,000. Upper corridor = 45+6 = 51%, and 52% exceeds it, confirming rebalancing is required. A is wrong: $90,000 would bring equity to 49%. B is wrong: $150,000 would bring equity to 47%. D is wrong: $270,000 would bring equity to 43%, undershooting the target.
Question 267
Risk budgeting: Asset A excess return = 4.5%, MCTR = 0.12. Asset B excess return = 3.0%, MCTR = 0.08. Portfolio Sharpe ratio = 0.375. Which asset's ratio of excess return to MCTR matches the portfolio Sharpe ratio?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — Both: A = 4.5/0.12 = 37.5 and B = 3.0/0.08 = 37.5
Explanation: C is correct: Asset A: 4.5%/0.12 = 37.5 (= portfolio SR of 0.375 × 100). Asset B: 3.0%/0.08 = 37.5. Both ratios equal 37.5, which equals the portfolio Sharpe ratio (0.375 expressed in consistent units). When all assets' excess return/MCTR ratios equal the portfolio Sharpe ratio, the risk allocation is optimal. A is wrong: Both assets are optimally allocated. B and D are wrong: Both match, not just one.
Question 268
An investor has $500,000 in financial assets and human capital PV = $1,200,000. What fraction of total economic wealth is financial assets?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: B — 29.4%
Explanation: B is correct: Total economic wealth = $500,000 + $1,200,000 = $1,700,000. Financial assets fraction = $500,000 / $1,700,000 = 29.4%. Human capital dominates at 70.6% of total wealth. A is wrong: 70.6% is the human capital fraction. C is wrong: $500K/$1.2M = 41.7% would be the ratio of financial to human capital only. D is wrong: 17.2% is an incorrect calculation.
Question 269
1/N rule with 8 asset classes. Portfolio = $4,000,000. How much is allocated to each asset class, and if domestic equity falls 15% while all other asset classes are flat, what is domestic equity's new weight?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: A — $500,000 each; new equity weight = 10.8%
Explanation: A is correct: Initial allocation per class = $4,000,000 / 8 = $500,000 each (12.5% each). Domestic equity after 15% decline = $500,000 × 0.85 = $425,000. New total portfolio = 7 × $500,000 + $425,000 = $3,500,000 + $425,000 = $3,925,000. New equity weight = $425,000 / $3,925,000 = 10.83% ≈ 10.8%. B is wrong: 11.2% is slightly off. C is wrong: $400,000 per class assumes N=10. D is wrong: 12.5% was the starting weight, not the new weight.
Question 270
MVO utility function: U = E(r) - 0.005 × λ × σ². Investor λ = 4. Portfolio A: E(r) = 9%, σ = 14%. Portfolio B: E(r) = 11%, σ = 18%. Which portfolio has higher utility?
Select an option first.
Correct answer: C — Portfolio A has higher utility; B has lower utility
Explanation: C is correct: Portfolio A: U = 9 - 0.005 × 4 × 14² = 9 - 0.02 × 196 = 9 - 3.92 = 5.08%. Portfolio B: U = 11 - 0.005 × 4 × 18² = 11 - 0.02 × 324 = 11 - 6.48 = 4.52%. Portfolio A (U=5.08%) > Portfolio B (U=4.52%). The investor with λ=4 prefers A despite its lower expected return. A is correct in spirit (U≈5.07-5.08%). B is wrong: B has lower utility (4.52%). D is wrong: The utilities differ.
More free CFA topics
Economics2,066
Quantitative Methods1,213
Portfolio Management1,079
Fixed Income908
Financial Statement Analysis904
Corporate Issuers884
Portfolio Construction605
Alternative Investments540
Specialized Pathway - Private Markets500
Derivatives498
Equity390
Performance Measurement295
Specialized Pathway - Portfolio Management253
Derivatives and Risk Management131
Ten questions in
- The ones you miss are saved as a drill you can repeat
- Your place is kept, on this device and any other
- A streak, if that is the thing that gets you back tomorrow
Every question on this page stays free and open either way.